[DOCKTESTERS] Sanger 2º validation (DO52140): Very small dicrepancies

Miguel Vazquez miguel.vazquez at cnio.es
Tue Dec 27 08:24:57 EST 2016


Dear all,

The test for the Sanger workflow on the second sample is complete. The
results are posted below.

In brief, *somatic* *indels* *and* *SV* *are a 100% match* (803986 and 6
respectively matches) there are *small differences* *in* *somatic.snv.mnv*
(+5 -7 with 87234 matches) *and* *somatic.cnv* (-2 and 36 matches)

Best regards

Report
~~~~~~

Comparison of somatic.cnv for DO52140 using Sanger
---
Common: 36
Extra: 0
Missing: 2
    - Example: 10:11767915:T:<CNV>,10:11779907:G:<CNV>


Comparison of somatic.indel for DO52140 using Sanger
---
Common: 803986
Extra: 0
Missing: 0


Comparison of somatic.snv.mnv for DO52140 using Sanger
---
Common: 87234
Extra: 5
    - Example: 1:23719098:A:G,12:43715930:T:A,20:4058335:T:A
Missing: 7
    - Example: 10:6881937:A:T,1:148579866:A:G,11:9271589:T:A


Comparison of somatic.sv for DO52140 using Sanger
---
Common: 6
Extra: 0
Missing: 0
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.icgc.org/mailman/private/docktesters/attachments/20161227/cea232b5/attachment.html>


More information about the docktesters mailing list